Multilateralism & Unilateralism

Is Trump Losing His Grip on the World Stage?

Trump’s diplomatic push this week showcased American strength through UN address and China talks, yet revealed growing limits to his global influence as allies resist demands, conflicts remain unresolved, and China gains economic leverage.

Multilateralism & Unilateralism

From Bandung to New Delhi: Non-Alignment after the Age of Blocs

The article examines how power redistribution from a unipolar to multipolar international system doesn’t automatically create a more equitable order, arguing that true transformation depends on whether autonomous centers remain connected and accountable to consequences beyond themselves, rather than simply multiplying separate power centers.

Multilateralism & Unilateralism

A New Arms Race is Threatening to Take-off—this time in Outer Space

The US has publicly acknowledged deploying weapons in space for defensive purposes, marking the first official confirmation amid an escalating space arms race with China and Russia. Experts warn the disclosure could violate the Outer Space Treaty and trigger a cascading arms race unless international agreements prohibit offensive space weapons.

Multilateralism & Unilateralism

Trump’s Unconscionable UN Rant

At the U.N. General Assembly, Trump threatened Iran with annihilation while dismissing artificial intelligence risks as a hoax, displaying dangerous ignorance about superintelligence and rejecting calls for AI safety safeguards.

Thought & Society

Between the USA-State Inc. and China’s Party-State

By Boaventura De Sousa Santos* – Meer Artificial Intelligence as a litmus test. The end of the Soviet Union and the socialist countries of Eastern Europe was hailed as the great universal consolidation of capitalism, considered the “natural” way to organize the economy and…

Multilateralism & Unilateralism

Trump declares victory in Greenland, but the deal exposes a deeper crisis of trust

Trump announced a security agreement with Denmark and Greenland that he portrayed as permanent US control over Greenland’s security, while Denmark and Greenland emphasized preserved sovereignty. The deal avoids territorial conflict but establishes a precedent of coercion against allies, normalizing sphere-of-influence politics that undermines NATO trust.