Obama, Trump and Biden: Consistency in Foreign Policy
By George Friedman* – Geopolitical Futures
foreign policy comes in phases. From the end of World War II to 1972,
its goal was to confront the Soviet Union and affiliated communist governments.
Things changed a little in the early 1970s, when the U.S., weakened by the
Vietnam War, began to work with China against the Soviet Union to eventually
reach a detente. This lasted until 1991 and the collapse of the Soviet Union.
From the early 1990s to 2001, Washington fixated on leading a global, peaceful
world order. That, too, changed on 9/11, after which policy revolved around the
global war on terror. The wars were costly and minimally effective.
The current phase of U.S. foreign policy was put into place
by Barack Obama. It consisted of reducing military forces in the Middle East
and creating a new relationship with the Muslim world; adopting a more
adversarial stance on Russia, including Moscow’s forays in its near abroad; and
confronting China on trade relations and, specifically, Beijing’s manipulation
of its currency.
Donald Trump’s foreign policy naturally followed. He also
sought to withdraw troops from the Middle East and to create a new relationship
in the region. He was instrumental in formalizing a coalition structure
consisting of certain Arab nations and Israel against Iran, and made some unexpected
troop withdrawals. He brought economic pressure on China, the effects of which
remain to be seen. And finally, he continued to confront Russia, maintaining
U.S. forces in Poland, Romania and the Black Sea.
There were, of course, many other dimensions of all their
foreign policies, but these were the most definitive. Relations with Europe
were a means to dealing with other issues, much as they had been since 1945.
Relations with East Asia were similarly instrumental. But the key elements of
the Obama-Trump foreign policy era was the withdrawal and restructuring of the
Middle East, containing Russia and confronting China. The language, gestures
and general atmosphere were different, but the reality was the same. They had
no other choices. The Middle East was essential, and George W. Bush’s foreign
policy had run its course.
Joe Biden steps into the presidency with as few choices as
Trump. The tone and tenor will be radically different, but the policy will not.
Biden has suggested, for example, that he will adopt a more conciliatory policy
toward Iran. The problem is that the new architecture of the region consists of
states fundamentally hostile to Iran, particularly its nuclear capabilities.
They do not trust Iranian promises on this issue, because betrayal could be
catastrophic to them. Biden cannot let the budding alliance structure fall
apart, nor can it afford to go forward without a strong U.S. hand. Biden can
say he wants to be more conciliatory to Iran, and he can be that, but he can do
so only by proposing an alternative to the regional alliance created during the
There is no indication that Biden intends to shift U.S.
policy on Russia and China. And if he does, it will be in response to how China
and Russia behave as he enters office. China could become conciliatory itself
and acquiesce to American demands, or it could become more militarily
aggressive first to test Biden and probe for weakness. How Biden reacts to
either scenario will reshape U.S.-Chinese relations. The initiative is in
China’s hands, since the U.S. can hold its current positions. Likewise, Russia
can continue to acquire strategic depth by creating informal realities in
places like Belarus or the South Caucasus. But if so, the U.S. will have to
modify – but not abandon – its containment policy. Just as the logic of the
Obama era remained in place under Trump, so too will the Trump logic hold under
Biden, adjusting to new realities and rhetoric. U.S. policy will continue to be
focused on the new Middle East alignment, Russian containment and confrontation
The promise to draw closer to global allies is praiseworthy
until it’s attempted. The U.S. can try to have warmer meetings with Europe, and
the Europeans might choose to become more confrontational with China, but that
will be because it is in their interest, not because it fits inside the
parameters of what constitutes “normal diplomacy.” The interests of the U.S.
and Europe don’t usually collide, nor do they perfectly align. The Europeans tend
to be risk averse, especially in places like Asia, where the U.S. can’t afford
to be lackadaisical. Everyone there is scared of China. A sudden reconciliation
between China and the United States would be an earthquake.
Foreign policy evolves, but it evolves rapidly and
dangerously. Biden is president, but his foreign policy, like that of all other
presidents, will be surrounded by domestic turpitudes and so will seek
predictability. (Oddly, Trump did as well, even when he appeared not to.) What
Biden fears is that thing likely to come: a gut check from the Chinese,
Russians or Iranians. If he is savvy enough, he will navigate them so that he
can hold fast to the policies he inherited. That is the most likely scenario.
Being innovative while being tested can have unexpected consequences. January
(Hungarian: Friedman György, Budapest, February 1, 1949) is
Hungarian-born U.S. geopolitical forecaster, and strategist on
international affairs. He is the founder and chairman of Geopolitical Futures,
an online publication that analyzes and forecasts the course of global events.
–Joe Biden must put an end to business as
usual. Here’s where to start – Bernie Sanders
In this time of unprecedented crises, Congress
and the Biden administration must respond through unprecedented action. Against
all of the evidence, tens of millions of Americans actually believe Trump’s Big
Lie that he won this election by a landslide and that victory was stolen from
him and his supporters.
–Profiting from Pardons: Giuliani Aide Told CIA
Whistleblower a Trump Pardon Would Cost $2 Million
With less than 12 hours before the end of his
presidency, Donald Trump issued 143 pardons and commutations, including a
pardon for Steve Bannon. Details continue to emerge about how allies of Trump
have personally profited from people seeking pardons. We speak with John
Kiriakou, a former CIA analyst and case officer who
exposed the Bush-era torture program and was the only official jailed in
connection to it, about the pardon system.