WASHINGTON DC, Apr 15 2021 (IPS) – Gender stereotyping in
the media has a significant impact on how women and gender minorities are
perceived. In turn, it affects their opportunities to fully and effectively
participate in public life.
Lack of inclusivity in the media is one reason for
widespread gender stereotyping. Recent findings from the 2020 Global Media
Monitoring Project show that the news media falls far short of being
an inclusive space for women, for example. The study found that women are
subjects or sources in the news just 26% of the time, and that only 31% of
experts consulted for televised COVID-19 stories were women.
The news media falls far short of being an inclusive space
for women – Women are subjects or sources in the news just 26% of the
time, and only 31% of experts consulted for televised COVID-19 stories
were women, finds study 2020 Global Media Monitoring Project
To discuss what we can do to counter stereotypes about women
and gender minorities in news coverage, NGO CSW65 –– the
civil society side of the UN Commission on the Status of Women –– convened a
panel discussion, moderated by ICFJ President Joyce Barnathan. The panel
explored the media’s role in mitigating gender stereotypes, and the potential
for regulatory frameworks to counter its prevalence in the media.
Panelists were Chiara Adamo, head of “Gender Equality, Human Rights and
Democratic Governance” at the European Commission, Motunrayo
Alaka, founder of the Wole Soyinka Centre for Investigative Journalism
in Nigeria, Taboom Media’s Founding Director Brian Pellot, Colombian
senator and former FARC commander Victoria Sandino, and Melanie Tobal,
the founder of Publicitarias.org.
Education is the most effective approach to fighting gender
stereotyping in the media, the panelists said. The goal is to train newsrooms
so that reporters can consciously rid themselves of their own biases. “Often,
the media pursues stories because it wants to meet a deadline and there is not
too much time to learn the nuances of the issue,” said Alaka.
Education initiatives should start with the basics, said
Tobal, since many people don’t even understand what gender stereotypes are.
Many journalists think that taking gender into consideration when covering a
story, and actively trying to fight the stereotypes that come with it is a
trend they can quickly master, she added. “They want magic solutions, like a
checklist or a quick workshop, or a quick talk and send,” she said. “But the
issues are very complex.”
Pellot’s Taboom Media works to improve media coverage of
LGBTQI+ rights. Without training, such topics are often misunderstood, and lack
of education on LGBTQI+ issues can lead to further gender stereotyping. Pellot
and his team train journalists on the concepts of informed consent and
anonymity, for example, as they relate to LGBTQI+ individuals.
“Everyone has met a woman in their life, they know women.
But the same is not necessarily true for sexual and gender minorities,” said
Pellot. As such, educating
newsrooms about LGBTQI+ coverage is focused on learning basic terminology
and expanding the definition of gender.
Newsrooms and journalists often have little incentive to
change how they incorporate gender perspectives in their reporting. Panelists
agreed that these initiatives need to come from leadership.
If activists and organizations can make it clear that better
coverage of women and gender minorities is essential for sustainability, more
newsrooms might seek training and create better incentives for their staff. As
Barnathan pointed out, if a news outlet excludes 50% of its audience it will
have a hard time thriving for much longer.
Adamo urged media funders to leverage their power to require
change. For example, the European Commission, of which she is a part, runs
the Creative Europe Media Program to support the
development, promotion and distribution of European media works. “For the next
seven years, we will ensure that those who request Creative Europe funds commit
to gender equality in their company strategies,” she said.
Regulation is a complex and delicate debate, said Adamo.
Regulators need to make sure different human rights at play do not conflict.
For instance, regulations should not unduly diminish freedom of expression for
the sake of protecting gender equality.
There are ways to go about it that work, she said. In 2018,
the European Commission introduced an audiovisual media directive prohibiting
broadcast news from containing content that incites hate or violence on the
grounds of race, ethnicity, gender or sexual orientation, for example.
“Conflict exacerbates stereotypes that lead to violence
against women and minorities,” said Sandino. The Colombian senator explained
that regulations aren’t meant to hinder the free press, but to set up an
inclusive ethical framework. She praised newsroom gender quotas as one option,
adding that there should be a minimum percentage of women required for senior
positions, as well.
Regulations are necessary, but they are a long route to
change, said Alaka. These efforts always need to be supplemented by local,
independent and immediate initiatives, such as training.
Tobal, based in Argentina, suggested that the country could
bridge regulation and education by extending a current law there that requires
training on gender perspective, diversity and violence for state workers to
include the media as well.
Sandino considers media ownership a key facet of the fight
for change. “In Colombia, there is no woman owner of media. All conglomerates
are handled by men. We need [women in charge] of information management,
language, elimination of stereotypes and creating the space for women,” she
The women in charge must also be equipped to affect positive
change, too, other panelists noted. “It’s not just that we’re getting more
women in the space that’s important, it’s that the women that are getting into
the space must have the right understanding of what they are going into the
space to do, what power they have, and what they are going to change,” said
Alaka. “They are going to program in a different way, they are going to frame
in a different way, they are going to staff in a different way. The agenda is
just different when they understand.”
The panelists agreed on the need to diversify sources and
cite more women experts on all issues. Oftentimes, journalists go to their same
sources repeatedly, out of convenience. The media, however, can help turn women
sources who aren’t usually consulted into top experts in their fields, or for
specific stories, Alaka noted.
“The media can make newsmakers,” she said. By adding women
experts to their source lists, journalists can help change the perception of
women in society.
Reducing gender stereotyping in the media won’t just result
in better reporting, it will radiate to the rest of society. “The advantage of
the media is that it goes beyond just taking care of itself. It can take care
of the rest of society, too, and that’s why it’s important to get the media
right so that we can help the rest of society,” said Alaka.